docs: update readme (#5)

This commit is contained in:
sioodmy 2024-08-13 21:14:38 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent e90de78b61
commit 58c6d9b384
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -47,12 +47,12 @@ Microfetch's performance is mostly hardware-dependant, however, the overall
trend seems to be < 2ms on any modern (2015 and after) CPU. Below are the
benchmarks with Hyperfine on my desktop system.
| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative |
| :----------- | ----------: | -------: | -------: | -------------: |
| `microfetch` | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.00 |
| `pfetch` | 254.2 ± 4.8 | 246.7 | 264.9 | 191.97 ± 7.10 |
| `neofetch` | 735.4 ± 9.5 | 721.1 | 752.8 | 555.48 ± 19.08 |
| `fastfetch` | 31.9 ± 0.8 | 30.8 | 33.8 | 24.08 ± 0.98 |
| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative | Written by raf? |
| :----------- | ----------: | -------: | -------: | -------------: | ----------------:
| `microfetch` | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.00 | yes |
| `pfetch` | 254.2 ± 4.8 | 246.7 | 264.9 | 191.97 ± 7.10 | no |
| `neofetch` | 735.4 ± 9.5 | 721.1 | 752.8 | 555.48 ± 19.08 | no |
| `fastfetch` | 31.9 ± 0.8 | 30.8 | 33.8 | 24.08 ± 0.98 | no |
_As far as I'm concerned, Microfetch is faster than almost every fetch tool
there is. The only downside of using Rust is introducing more "bloated"