From 58c6d9b384b589b8df799bdbaa90f086b8e9f20e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sioodmy Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 21:14:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] docs: update readme (#5) --- README.md | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index decae73..b6e9d8f 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -47,12 +47,12 @@ Microfetch's performance is mostly hardware-dependant, however, the overall trend seems to be < 2ms on any modern (2015 and after) CPU. Below are the benchmarks with Hyperfine on my desktop system. -| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative | -| :----------- | ----------: | -------: | -------: | -------------: | -| `microfetch` | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.00 | -| `pfetch` | 254.2 ± 4.8 | 246.7 | 264.9 | 191.97 ± 7.10 | -| `neofetch` | 735.4 ± 9.5 | 721.1 | 752.8 | 555.48 ± 19.08 | -| `fastfetch` | 31.9 ± 0.8 | 30.8 | 33.8 | 24.08 ± 0.98 | +| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative | Written by raf? | +| :----------- | ----------: | -------: | -------: | -------------: | ----------------: +| `microfetch` | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.00 | yes | +| `pfetch` | 254.2 ± 4.8 | 246.7 | 264.9 | 191.97 ± 7.10 | no | +| `neofetch` | 735.4 ± 9.5 | 721.1 | 752.8 | 555.48 ± 19.08 | no | +| `fastfetch` | 31.9 ± 0.8 | 30.8 | 33.8 | 24.08 ± 0.98 | no | _As far as I'm concerned, Microfetch is faster than almost every fetch tool there is. The only downside of using Rust is introducing more "bloated"