mirror of
				https://github.com/NotAShelf/tct.git
				synced 2025-10-31 19:32:37 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	docs: link Nix in readme
This commit is contained in:
		
					parent
					
						
							
								acd1b12bc0
							
						
					
				
			
			
				commit
				
					
						f55394eaf8
					
				
			
		
					 1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
				
			
		
							
								
								
									
										12
									
								
								README.md
									
										
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										12
									
								
								README.md
									
										
									
									
									
								
							|  | @ -1,8 +1,8 @@ | |||
| # tct | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| **tct** (**t** **p**arallel **t**imer) is a quick and minimal program (70 LoC!) | ||||
| that helps determine the "optimal" number of parallel TCP requests for your | ||||
| network connection. | ||||
| **tct** (**t** **p**arallel **t**imer) is a quick and minimal program (< 70 | ||||
| LoC!) that helps determine the "optimal" number of parallel TCP requests for | ||||
| your network connection. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| It performs a series of tests (following your desired configuration) by | ||||
| incrementally increasing the number of parallel requests and measuring the time | ||||
|  | @ -13,9 +13,9 @@ requests does not significantly reduce the overall time taken. | |||
| 
 | ||||
| ## Motivation | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| The [Nix Package Manager]() has an option called `http-connections` that, as per | ||||
| the wiki, sets the _"maximum number of parallel TCP connections used to fetch | ||||
| files from binary caches and by other downloads."_ | ||||
| The [Nix Package Manager](https://github.com/NixOS/nix) has an option called | ||||
| `http-connections` that, as per the wiki, sets the _"maximum number of parallel | ||||
| TCP connections used to fetch files from binary caches and by other downloads."_ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| I have found this option a little obscure, however, as the default value (`25`) | ||||
| has no solid motivation behind it. Is it optimal? I don't know. Can it be | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue