NotAShelf/microfetch
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/NotAShelf/microfetch.git synced 2025-11-03 23:32:19 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

docs: update readme

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
sioodmy 2024-08-13 21:06:42 +00:00 • committed by GitHub
commit 79ef8d35c0
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
README.md
View file

@ -47,12 +47,12 @@ Microfetch's performance is mostly hardware-dependant, however, the overall
trend seems to be < 2ms on any modern (2015 and after) CPU. Below are the trend seems to be < 2ms on any modern (2015 and after) CPU. Below are the
benchmarks with Hyperfine on my desktop system. benchmarks with Hyperfine on my desktop system.
| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative | | Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative | Written by raf? |
| :----------- | ----------: | -------: | -------: | -------------: | | :----------- | ----------: | -------: | -------: | -------------: | ----------------:
| `microfetch` | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.00 | | `microfetch` | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.00 | yes |
| `pfetch` | 254.2 ± 4.8 | 246.7 | 264.9 | 191.97 ± 7.10 | | `pfetch` | 254.2 ± 4.8 | 246.7 | 264.9 | 191.97 ± 7.10 | no |
| `neofetch` | 735.4 ± 9.5 | 721.1 | 752.8 | 555.48 ± 19.08 | | `neofetch` | 735.4 ± 9.5 | 721.1 | 752.8 | 555.48 ± 19.08 | no |
| `fastfetch` | 31.9 ± 0.8 | 30.8 | 33.8 | 24.08 ± 0.98 | | `fastfetch` | 31.9 ± 0.8 | 30.8 | 33.8 | 24.08 ± 0.98 | no |
_As far as I'm concerned, Microfetch is faster than almost every fetch tool _As far as I'm concerned, Microfetch is faster than almost every fetch tool
there is. The only downside of using Rust is introducing more "bloated" there is. The only downside of using Rust is introducing more "bloated"